Social architecture, deception and the human product

I think it is finally time to put this down, so that things are clear, and those who are unsure may be helped.

Social dynamics

Social dynamics – this is the key term, and I will get into its finer grains below:

Set theory

Set theory – it's part of the above, i.e. defines it crudely. If you're not well versed in math, you may look it up briefly.
Persons interests can : Intersect ∩, create alliance ∪, be included within another ⊆ ⊂ (subset), not be included ⊄, share ideas ∈, and the like.

So we see that set theory represents what actions are taken (e.g. unity) and why (e.g. share ideas ∈).
This can break if ∉. The ∉ symbol means ideas are not shared, so the interests are no longer the same.

From abstract to psychological

I want to go from the abstract (which is great for visualization), to the psychological.
There are different groups of human, and each are defined by their genetics and environment.
Botany (particularly Plant Genetics) teaches about the behavior of a plant.

Artemisia absinthium, is often found on road sides, waste and abandoned grounds.
I can strive there due: Low competition (as these are nutrient poor — hence unattractive), Chemically potent (absinth (an elder spirit) makes use of thujone. The payload which the plant uses as natural defense.)

The human is just so structured and defined (the deniance of politically loaded individuals won't change this).

Distorted reality

This paragraph is more a necessity of its current times, and would have been omitted (or not thought of) in previous eras.
Egalitarianism and Collectivism both frame life forms as “equal”, when in fact they are not.
Comparing Artemisia absinthium with a Pine will clearly reveal this. Putting Artemisia into the environment of a pine will do so too. And finally looking at the DNA of these plants will be the most penalizing to those in disbelief.
But I hear them already: “humans are not plants” (while attributing life and sacredness to every strand of grass).

The more crucial point of this chapter is this:
Deceiving others of fundamental occurrences in nature gives a special leverage.

It defines the victims' downstream actions, more so it makes them deceive themselves.
They will excuse things to maintain this illusion. They will take on crass losses, and find different reasons to blame, only to avoid admitting “yes, I have been deceived”.

Essentially they are walking on a path of self‑maintained and enforced cognitive dissonance with nature.

Those who profit from deception

Let's look at those who profit from deceiving others.
It is usually the scammers, but not as most people think i.e. shady products and schemes.

The win is social navigation.
This gives exposure to the human itself. Usable for hedonist and decadent intentions.
A human landscape designed with one thing in mind:

• Never let them come to the conclusion that a person genetically inhabits hedonism and decadence.
• The people should inhale the idea of Egalitarianism, so we will never be punished. They will never find out about us. Because they think it's a “thing” born from thin air, when it's in the genetics.
• Only thus we are immune, can terrorize and get away.

This brings us to the last understanding to achieve.

Darwinism

Within nature, no law or god will come from the sky, making right what has been done unjust.
Those who are deceived will remain to think this or inhabit it deeply within their psyche.

Set Theory unveils the Darwinist mechanics in almost vulgare simplicity. Alliances and more so friendships are so fungible as these are built on interest alignment.

The human as product

When the actions of a person make right for itself, such person may procreate due to its exploitation of Darwinist concepts. The product of this forwards a few contracts which are expected to be signed in certain societies, or not in others.

This is the product of the decadent and hedonist: it has duplicated its accumulative genetics into a physically detached product of itself. This product will hence repeat the paternal genetics and continue to accumulate in order to satisfy its decadent and hedonist pleasure, potentially procreating if Darwinist occurrences are favorable.

So the endless wash, or using the terminology of Oswald Spengler “Cycles of civilization”, will eternally move on. The mundane repetition of the decadent and hedonistic product creature will cycle forwards as observed by philosophers and thinkers.