0

---

The right wing and conservatives have forwarded arguments and positions centered around culture, whenever the debate on migration emerges.

Doing so they screwed themselves brutally.

The left counter-argument to this is : A German will consume a polish beer, and has there by crossed the cultural border to enrich his life (good taste, experience… so on).

Then this argument gets universalized, e.g. take India in the equation or Africa, add any other continent, nation harboring some sort of culture.

This is where the conservative/right does what ?

Usually drift onto crime and argue about criminal cultures and the like. Attempting a sneaky escape.

---

Well, this dialectic is… tiresome, goes nowhere, its just wasted energy on both sides, and thus to no surprise is going since decades. It just never resolved, and the proof for that you can obtain in election polls or if our very social and less analytic by engaging with various layers of society.

---

So how do we resolve this ?
Nations and cultures are symptoms, they formularize themselves into : act/time = nation, culture…
The same applies to religions, as these are merely cults, and are fungible/swappable on a being.

What’s missing here is the initiator and the differences between the initiators.

In order to make this out, we will look at haplogroups.

These are de-constructible in their IQ, and hence downstream acts, emerging from such.

This is the central point to differences, not a symptom being debated such as a curry meal which is balls to the wall absurd.

The end.
Death to the right wing
Death to conservatives